Monday, May 22, 2006
PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! PLEASE UPDATE YOUR BOOKMARKS! |
8 Comments:
I like it, it tends to make it more personal to me.
THANKS! I'll be doing more of these in future posts. :D
THANKS for the feedback, Kelly! I did that one from my cell phone on speaker phone. I think I'll use either a land line or not put my cell phone on speaker the next time I audioblog. I like the interview in the field idea and can record up to five minutes which would be plenty of time to ask some questions. THANKS again for sharing your thoughts!
Sounds good but agree the tone quality needs work. Scared the dog when he heard it-he is still looking for the owner of that voice!
Sounds alright to me Jimmy,
It would be great for interviews!
Hey, I finally get to hear your voice!
I played it using the Apple Quicktime player. The audio quality is comparable to a telephone conversation, with some hum. But otherwise, good idea, and nice to hear you, Jimmy!
Very observant, Science! Actually, audioblogging does use a telephone to post the messages and that buzzing you hear is the speaker phone on my cell phone. I'm still getting used to the audioblogging and will try to improve the quality for future posts. THANKS for the feedback!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home