Thursday, June 15, 2006

The AMA Selectively Decides What Is Healthy

A label with an exclamation point and "HIGH" coming to a food near you

This Washington Post story reveals a grand new scheme by the nation's largest physician's group about how they want to help control the rise in blood pressure and heart disease rates -- put "warning labels" on foods that contain, in their opinion, too much salt.

The delegates at the annual meeting of the American Medical Association voted earlier this week in favor of strongly requesting the U.S. government to force food companies to label any food they consider "high-salt," defined by them as 480mg or higher, to help consumers make better choices about how much salt they are consuming at restaurants and in the processed foods they purchase at the grocery store.

The overall goal is to cut the amount of salt consumption in half by 2016.

Here's a common sense question to ask: Why is this the role of the government? I keep bringing this question up (like those who want to make restaurants cut their portion sizes and calories) because it seems more and more people are wanting the government to do everything for them lately, including THINKING and making the right decisions. But people can learn exactly what they are eating by religiously reading the nutritional labels on the foods they buy at the supermarket and by visiting the nutritional page at their favorite restaurant's web site.

I'm no fan of salt myself, but it's absolutely absurd that a group like the AMA thinks the American people are too stupid to know what they are putting in their mouth that they think the government should MANDATE warning labels on our foods regarding salt because of health problems. But my question is where do the warning labels stop?

Sure, we can put the word "high" on the packaging with lots of red exclamation points to bring attention to the salt content in the foods we eat (one of the recommendations of the AMA, by the way), but what about other decidedly unhealthy ingredients found in foods -- like SUGAR?!

Oh, well wait just a minute there mister! Don't you know sugar is considered a "GRAS" food (no, not the kind of grass you would smoke and get high off of, although it sounds like the AMA board has been smoking something!)? GRAS is an acronymn for a food that is "generally recognized as safe" by the AMA. Guess what is on that list with salt and pepper? Yep, it's sugar!

And salt has been on that list for many years, but now the AMA geniuses want the FDA to revoke that position from salt because Americans are eating nearly 5000mg of it daily, or twice the recommended intake.

SO WHAT ABOUT SUGAR?!?!?!?! How much MORE is the public consuming of table sugar, high fructose corn syrup, and all those other fancy names for sugar these days, all to the detriment of their health? Where are the warning labels on THAT, AMA?!

While I am not advocating putting warning labels on foods with "too much sugar" in them (like this extremist group is proposing for sugary soft drinks), what I am saying is that the AMA seems to be selectively deciding for Americans what is healthy for them and what is not. It's none of the government's business what people are putting in their mouths because it is their choice to do this to themselves and nobody else's.

Let's stop playing this cat and mouse game that people don't know how much salt and sugar they are eating in the foods they eat. I guarantee you most people don't give a flying rip about the nutritional content and would ignore warning labels anyway. That idea sure worked well for cigarettes, didn't it?

The evidence the AMA collected on the health impact of salt showed eating it in excess can raise your blood pressure and cause cardiovascular problems. But as my friend Regina Wilshire often reminds me, that is only for a small segment of the population who are considered "salt sensitive." Wouldn't you know it, I'm one of the lucky ones to have this condition. Yee haw! That's why I replace a lot of my salt intake with this excellent potassium-based product instead.

We've heard about what salt does to our health, but how about the "risk factors" for overconsuming sugar, AMA? Hmm, let's see, we've got obesity, insulin resistance which can lead to diabetes, heart disease, tooth decay, hyperactivity, blood sugar spikes...need I go on? If you want to talk about an ingredient found in the majority of foods today that is causing a lot of health problems, then look no further than the sugar that is pumped into so many foods with nary a peep out of the AMA. It'll scare you when you realize just how much this has infiltrated our food supply and the AMA remains silent. Very peculiar.

Where are the warnings about sugar leading to two out of every three Americans becoming overweight or obese? It makes that silly 30 percent with high blood pressure number pale in comparison, don't you think? The fact that 1 in 3 Americans is either diabetic or pre-diabetic right now should really be the focus of any group who claims to be an advocate for public health.

"Ultimately, substantial cooperation among the government, the food industry, physicians and the nutrition community will be required to accomplish meaningful change," the report concluded.

How about letting the market continue to work WITHOUT any intervention on the part of the government? Sure, doctors and nutritionists can have their say about what their patients should do, but it will ultimately come back to the patient making up his or her mind about what is best for their health. Leave the food industry alone because nobody is making people buy their products or visit their restaurants.

The AMA unfortunately has a great deal of influence over governmental agencies like the FDA. So don't be surprised if you're walking through the supermarket in 2007 and you see a whole bunch of "HIGH!!!" warning labels on foods. And we won't even talk about what the menu at a Chinese restaurants will look like. EEEEEEK!


Blogger Gary said...

Time to expose the AMA and the ADA as organizations that lobby on behalf of big business. The AMA selectively issues "guidelines" and recommends "the good diet" consistent with the ridiculous federal government food pyramid, the darling of the big food processors and agricultural producers. So people think corn oil margarine is just fine ("low or no cholesterol") and everyone is mum on high fructose corn syrup, which is added to almost every processed food in some amount.

And when the AMA and Feds recommend that the basis of a good diet should be grains, please show me which breads they are talking about because there is no bread on our supermarket shelves today that isn't made of highly refined wheat flour, which is rapidly converted into glucose and devoid of anything nutritious except for the added vitamins and minerals so they can label the bread "enriched". And it's "enriched" because the flour is made from grain that has been degermed, eliminating the most nutritious part of the grain and the fiber. Then they add some fiber back, but in the end, it remains a far cry from breads made with stone ground flours. And Americans eat it in large amounts because it's a "no-fat, no-cholesterol" food.

Then we drink huge quantities of sugar-laden beverages from orange juice to sweetened "fruit" juices ("Hi-C with 10% real fruit juice!" as if 10% were something to brag about) to sodas, and sodas not even sweetened with cane sugar as in the last generation, but rather using high fructose corn syrup. Hot dogs and pizza for school lunches. Gatorade instead of water. Can you say elevated blood sugar and diabetes anyone? Can you say coronary heart disease from arterial inflammation due to high blood sugar and elevated insulin levels? Can you imagine the AMA or the Feds recommending the limit of sugar-laden beverages to, say, one or two a day, as a glass of orange juice in the morning, and preferably orange juice with real pulp in it? And the banning of high fructose corn syrup from our foods and beverages?

6/15/2006 11:11 AM  
Blogger Kalyn said...

Hi Jimmy,
Thanks for visiting my blog and for your always kind words.

6/15/2006 3:08 PM  
Blogger Science4u1959 said...

Did you know, incidentally, that there is not a SHRED of evidence that salt causes high blood pressure and all the other ailments attributed to the consumption of salt?

The facts are that the human body NEEDS SALT in rather large quantities in order to function in an effective and efficient way. Salt has been, and still is, extremely high valued in several countries and has been "money" for millenia.

Only our "modern dietary wisdom" health "experts" are demonizing salt. There are many studies showing no correlation whatsoever between salt intake and blood pressure. In fact a too low intake of (iodized) salt is a major problem in many Asian countries, particularly China. Our bodies need salt!

6/16/2006 3:17 AM  
Blogger Oyibo Pepe said...

Thanks for this Im starting a diet blog too !!

6/17/2006 9:19 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home